Wordsmith.Org

Wordsmith Talk

 About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith Talk » Forums » General Topics » Weekly Themes » logy
Register User    Forum List        Calendar     Active Topics     FAQ
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Topic Options
#180399 - 11/18/08 10:45 AM Re: Logy's AT4T [Re: The Pook]
twosleepy Offline
addict

Registered: 02/28/08
Posts: 464
Loc: western NY
This reminds me of the many Americans who believe that "separation of church and state" means that it is forbidden to discuss religion, or things religious, in public schools. This is complete nonsense. It is forbidden to compel students to subscribe to a particular religion (evangelizing), but not to discuss or inform. It's also not "against the constitution" for students to gather on school grounds for a religious purpose, as long as it does not violate any laws and is strictly voluntary. :0)

Top
#180400 - 11/18/08 11:14 AM Re: Logy's AT4T [Re: twosleepy]
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 04/03/00
Posts: 8911
Loc: this too shall pass
>to discuss or inform

to discuss or inform in an exclusionary fashion becomes problematic (but now we're approaching that forbidden ground).

Top
#180406 - 11/18/08 03:17 PM Re: Logy's AT4T [Re: tsuwm]
twosleepy Offline
addict

Registered: 02/28/08
Posts: 464
Loc: western NY
Funny, I didn't see the words "in an exclusionary fashion" in what I wrote. Perhaps you're reading something into it? :0)

Top
#180408 - 11/18/08 03:35 PM Re: Logy's AT4T [Re: twosleepy]
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 04/03/00
Posts: 8911
Loc: this too shall pass
no; I added those words purposefully -- exclusion is what often happens in the event.

Top
#180423 - 11/18/08 10:20 PM Re: Logy's AT4T [Re: tsuwm]
Faldage Online content
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 12/01/00
Posts: 11846
For example, The Pook's assertion that William James's comment is only true if God exists has as an unstated premise that a man has a true existence only if there is God to perceive that true existence. The assertion was worded in such a way as to appear to be a proof of the existence of God. Hence my claim of petitio principii. But perhaps The Pook was offering it as a reductio ad absurdum. One never know, do one?

Top
#180425 - 11/18/08 10:42 PM Re: Logy's AT4T [Re: Faldage]
The Pook Offline
old hand

Registered: 02/20/08
Posts: 957
Loc: Tasmania
Not quite.

Top
#180438 - 11/19/08 11:51 AM Re: Logy's AT4T [Re: The Pook]
BobVVore Offline
stranger

Registered: 11/17/08
Posts: 6
Loc: PST
>sigh<

I thought I was just commenting on AT4Ts that say something essentially critical about religion. It gains nothing, produces nothing. This week has another.

I wasn't stating whether or not religions were opiates of the masses. If religion is not a useful topic here (and of course a warm topic as seen already), to which I agree, then the AT4Ts themselves are suspect. I love the words. Perhaps my method bringing the AT4T to attention was wrong. There are many others far more articulate than me who can say what I wished to say in a better manner. That's why I kept it short. Hmm. and this is loong. ("since brevity is the soul of wit, and tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes, I will be brief ..." -- I follow in your footsteps, Polonius!)

Bob V-Vore

Top
#180439 - 11/19/08 12:16 PM Re: Logy's AT4T [Re: BobVVore]
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Registered: 04/03/00
Posts: 8911
Loc: this too shall pass
if you have a comment regarding AWAD itself, you should address it to Anu Garg [he seldom posts in these forums unless it is *truly administrative; e.g. regarding a software update.]

you can reach him via the Feedback link at the bottom of this page.

..or via the Contact Us link from within the daily mail, if you get that.

Top
#180447 - 11/19/08 07:29 PM Re: Logy's AT4T [Re: tsuwm]
BobVVore Offline
stranger

Registered: 11/17/08
Posts: 6
Loc: PST
Originally Posted By: tsuwm
if you have a comment regarding AWAD itself, you should address it to Anu Garg [he seldom posts in these forums unless it is *truly administrative; e.g. regarding a software update.]

you can reach him via the Feedback link at the bottom of this page.

..or via the Contact Us link from within the daily mail, if you get that.


We are acquainted via previous e-mails. He knows quite well how I feel. He, like many really smart people, thinks highly of his own opinions. In a previous AWAD summary, he does respond to someone's critique of an ad, responding that he wasn't responsible for the content of the ads (??).

However, this moves me to try again.

Thanks

Top
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2


Forum Stats
6784 Members
16 Forums
12336 Topics
181270 Posts

Max Online: 853 @ 10/23/07 11:39 AM
Who's Online
2 registered (Faldage, Jackie), 9 Guests and 13 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
northodox, Michael Paris, hellerfan, Conora, PastorVon
6783 Registered Users
Top Posters
wwh 13858
Faldage 11846
Jackie 9812
tsuwm 8911
AnnaStrophic 6436
Wordwind 6296
etaoin 6251
of troy 5400
maverick 4683
WhitmanO'Neill 4186
January
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Mark all read
Contact Us · Wordsmith Talk · Top

Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 2009 Wordsmith.org