#180048 - 11/03/08 08:33 AM
Prepositions !!
|
enthusiast
Registered: 10/30/06
Posts: 275
Loc: Orlando
|
In today's AWAD, Anu states; "Prepositions don't get much respect. Nouns, verbs, adjectives... those are the words we usually pay attention to."
Hasn't he just broken a 'golden rule' regarding prepositions?!
I was taught, "A preposition is something you NEVER end a sentence with".
And I gotten my face slapped because I keep forgetting that, "A proposition is something you never end a sentence with."
_________________________
"I am certain there is too much certainty in the world" -Michael Crichton
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#180049 - 11/03/08 09:16 AM
Re: heads
[Re: ParkinT]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/13/05
Posts: 1837
Loc: R'lyeh
|
Hasn't he just broken a 'golden rule' regarding prepositions?!Not hardly. The not-ending-a-sentence-with-a-preposition "rule" was invented out of whole cloth by just one man, John Dryden, for just one reason, he didn't like ending sentences with prepositions. People have been placing prepositions where they fit best for many hundreds of years before or after Mr Dryden elevated his quirky style to a "grammatical rule". [ link and link]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#180071 - 11/04/08 06:06 AM
Re: heads
[Re: zmjezhd]
|
stranger
Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 22
Loc: Ireland
|
Thanks for those links, zmjezhd! I do like a bit of grammar myself, and I must say that my strictest instruction in grammar, particularly punctuation, came during the time I wrote limericks for OEDILF (under the name of Recumbentman). Nobody is as particular about correct usage as a correct American, I found. As an admirer of Wittgenstein I regard grammar as important, but I agree that many shibboleths grew from a misplaced wish to import Latin grammar into English. The English saw themselves in the 17th century as heirs of the classics, particularly Dryden, who wrote in praise of Milton: "Three poets in three different ages born, Greece, Italy, and England did adorn. . . " Curiously, Dryden wouldn't have got away with that comma between subject (three poets) and verb (did adorn) in OEDILF; at the least he would have been requested to add another comma after 'poets', making 'in three different ages born' into a proper subsidiary clause. I often put Anu's 'Thoughts for Today' into my collection of quotes; today I snipped his wisdom about prepositions: A note about ending a sentence with a preposition. Some believe there's something wrong with that. It's a myth. One can find sentences ending with preps in the lines of some of the finest writers in history: Chaucer, Swift, Kipling, Shakespeare and so on. "We are such stuff as dreams are made on" -- Try rephrasing that line from The Tempest. See what inelegant glob results. This canard about no-prepositions-at-the-end belongs in the same dustbin as "Thou shalt not split an infinitive."
So the next time people fault you for ending a sentence with a preposition, ask them: "What are you talking about?"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#180075 - 11/04/08 08:33 AM
Re: heads
[Re: Andrew Robinson]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/13/05
Posts: 1837
Loc: R'lyeh
|
I must say that my strictest instruction in grammar, particularly punctuation, came during the time I wrote limericks for OEDILF.
Oh, spelling and punctuation have nothing to do with grammar. That's another nit I have with the so-callled experts. And before another flame war starts, let me explain. Saying that grammar, spelling, and punctuation are separate entities does not mean that the latter two or any less important than the former. When I speak about grammar, I use the definition that most linguists (professional academics who study language systematically rather than inventing or passing along silly rules). Spelling and punctuation are attempts, however flawed, to add a sort of sugar coating to language. Language existed before writing. English spelling is a joke. It is a non-system, compared to something like Spanish or Korean. I have seen the "rules" of punctuation change in my lifetime. Many of the punctuation rules I learned in grammar and high school have been modified and superseded.
Wittgenstein does have some keen insights into language, especially seeing it as a kind of game. (He was the first philosopher, one of whose works I read.) Heidegger also had some worthwhile ideas about language. My favorite Wittgensteinian aphorism is: "philosophische Probleme entstehen, wenn die Sprache feiert" (Philospophical problems occur when language goes on holiday).
(And don't get me started about Oedilf; that lot has sucked the joy out of language and poetry.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#180087 - 11/05/08 05:42 AM
Re: heads
[Re: zmjezhd]
|
stranger
Registered: 10/16/08
Posts: 22
Loc: Ireland
|
About spelling: Wittgenstein disliked rationalised languages like Esperanto, largely because the curiosities of spelling were lost. Each word that has a strange spelling carries part of its history along with it. He likened languages to cities, with an idiomatic ancient centre full of seemingly inexplicable corners, and new suburbs (like scientific language) laid out in straight lines at right angles.
About punctuation: what you say is interesting, but I have always regarded punctuation as an essential element of grammar. Of course this is a recent development, tied to writing rather than speech, but very important, and now surely indispensable.
Old punctuation puzzle:
Caesar entered on his head
A helmet on each foot
A sandal in his hand he held
His trusty sword to boot
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#180088 - 11/05/08 07:11 AM
Re: heads
[Re: Andrew Robinson]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 06/23/06
Posts: 2310
Loc: Netherlands, the Hague
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#180090 - 11/05/08 09:41 AM
Re: heads
[Re: Andrew Robinson]
|
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/13/05
Posts: 1837
Loc: R'lyeh
|
About punctuation: what you say is interesting, but I have always regarded punctuation as an essential element of grammar. Of course this is a recent development, tied to writing rather than speech, but very important, and now surely indispensable.
I stand by what I wrote. Spelling and punctuation are important, but not a part of grammar.
The thing about the old puzzle you pose is that it can be understood without any punctuation at all.
"Caesar entered. On his head a helmet, on each foot a sandal, [and] in his hand, he held his trusty sword."
There is nothing ungrammatical about the unpunctuated version. If I reformatted it in a difficult to read font, it would still be grammatical. Also, the sentence "Caesar entered on his head, a helmet on each foot, a sandal in his hand he held. His trusty sword to boot." is also grammatical but improbable.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#180107 - 11/05/08 05:21 PM
Re: heads
[Re: Jackie]
|
member
Registered: 11/24/07
Posts: 187
|
I saw on the travel channel the other day that there is a language of whistles. It's in some really mountainous area--possibly Romania but I really don't remember--and the people of different villages whistle back and forth to each other across the valleys. It was described as an actual language, not a code or anything. ?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
6784 Members
16 Forums
12336 Topics
181255 Posts
Max Online: 853 @ 10/23/07 11:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
FAQ
Previous Topic
Index