#173503 - 02/12/08 10:25 PM
Base Word vs. Root word (or root)
|
Bigwig Rabbit
newbie
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 31
Loc: California, USA
|
Among our faculty, there is a casual banter going on about root words Vs. base words. One school of thought is that the two are interchangeable terms. The other group adamantly contends that a base word is one that can stand alone, while a root is a word part that needs some sort of inflectional ending, prefix, suffix, or combination of those in order to be sensible. My thought is that some roots can stand alone, such as flex, while many other roots cannot (like glo as in conglomerate). Is there any consensus here that can lay to rest this most scholarly and magmanimous dispute?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#173516 - 02/13/08 07:10 AM
Re: Base Word vs. Root word (or root)
[Re: Bigwig Rabbit]
|
zmjezhd
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/13/05
Posts: 1679
Loc: R'lyeh
|
In describing inflected languages, like Latin, Greek, or Sanskrit, a distinction between affixes (pre-, in-, and suffixes) and desinences (grammatical endings) is usually made. The former are usually called derivational morphemes (they change the meaning), and the latter inflectional (they indicate the syntactic relationships between words in a phrase). In the study of morphology, there is a difference between free and bound morphemes: free ones can stand on their own, but bound ones are usually affixes, though some like the rasp in raspberry are not. The problem may be with less inflected languages, like English or Chinese. There a lexeme (aka lexical item, word) like man consists of a single morpheme, though come to think of it the Latin nominative singular vir 'man' has no explicit nominitival desinence, as rosa (i.e., the -a) does). Distinguishing between roots (single morphemes) and bases (root morpheme plus one or more affixes, or compounds) seems like a goodly distinction, though perhaps overkill for English morphology.
[Addendum: More on roots and stems.]
Edited by zmjezhd (02/13/08 09:01 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#173520 - 02/13/08 08:35 AM
Re: Base Word vs. Root word (or root)
[Re: BranShea]
|
zmjezhd
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/13/05
Posts: 1679
Loc: R'lyeh
|
Roots are also base, being all covered in dirt and such. Latin radix, radicis, (whence English radish and radical), Greek ριζα (rhiza), and German Wurzel are all cognate: from PIE *wrād- 'root' (also here).
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#173530 - 02/13/08 02:18 PM
Re: Base Word vs. Root word (or root)
[Re: BranShea]
|
zmjezhd
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/13/05
Posts: 1679
Loc: R'lyeh
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#173541 - 02/13/08 06:46 PM
Re: Base Word vs. Root word (or root)
[Re: zmjezhd]
|
Bigwig Rabbit
newbie
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 31
Loc: California, USA
|
zmjezhd,
Though I had to read your post 4 times to understand it, I declare it the most helpful. The links were quite useful as well. Now I can return to my small pond and be the big fish, dazzling them with my brilliance (as opposed to baffling them).
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#173550 - 02/13/08 09:27 PM
Re: ein grundriss der ichsucht
[Re: zmjezhd]
|
Zed
Pooh-Bah
Registered: 08/27/02
Posts: 1734
Loc: British Columbia, Canada
|
Awww. but you're such a cute lophalgiac, paleocopric pedant.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
6630 Members
16 Forums
12173 Topics
178716 Posts
Max Online: 853 @ 10/23/07 11:39 AM
|
|
1 registered
(Jackie)
and 17 anonymous users online.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search FAQ
